Article 17 web tool

Log in
Article 17 > Species summary

Species assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a species belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that species.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The 'Data sheet info' includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per species.

The 'Audit trail' includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad
Current selection: 2013-2018, Reptiles, Testudo hermanni, All bioregions. Annexes Y, Y, N. Show all Reptiles
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Population Habitat for the species Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution
area (km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRR
Min
Member State
code		 Reporting units Alternative units
Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate
BG N/A N/A 53 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
BG N/A N/A 118 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
BG N/A N/A 747 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT 55 110 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
RO 2 20 5 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
ES 59 5900 N/A grids1x1 estimate 10000 50000 N/A i N/A
FR 3480 3723 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A estimate
GR N/A N/A 28090 grids1x1 estimate 1000000 5000000 N/A i estimate
HR N/A N/A 280 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
IT 389 778 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
RO 2 10 5 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
Max
Best value Unit Type est. Method Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRP Unit Occupied
suff.		 Unoccupied
suff.		 Status Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 Distrib. Method % MS
BG ALP 23600 100 - 23600 N/A N/A 53 grids1x1 minimum b 100 x 53 grids1x1 Y FV = poor poor poor U1 U1 x FV method method 8300 b 100
BG BLS 8300 100 = 8300 N/A N/A 118 grids1x1 minimum b 100 - 118 grids1x1 N Unk XX u unk unk unk XX U1 x U2 - noChange noChange 6500 b 100
BG CON 90500 83.33 = 90500 N/A N/A 747 grids1x1 minimum b 89.51 - 407 grids1x1 Y U1 - poor poor poor U1 U1 - U1 - noChange noChange 66100 b 86.41
IT CON 10000 9.21 - > 55 110 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 9.89 - >> Y U2 - bad bad bad U2 U2 - U2 - genuine genuine 4900 b 6.41
RO CON 8100 7.46 = ≈ 2 20 5 grids1x1 minimum b 0.60 = 5 grids1x1 Y FV = good good good FV FV = U1 N/A knowledge knowledge 5500 b 7.19
ES MED 8000 3.84 - ≈ 59 5900 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 8.38 = 50000 i Y U1 = poor poor poor U1 U1 - U2 - genuine knowledge 6000 a 5.83
FR MED 3643 1.75 u x 3480 3723 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 10.14 u x Unk Unk U1 - poor poor poor U1 U1 - U2 = method method 16100 b 15.63
GR MED 90928.84 43.70 = ≈ N/A N/A 28090 grids1x1 estimate b 79.05 - ≈ N Unk U1 - good poor poor XX U1 - U1 - noChange noChange 31000 b 30.10
HR MED 23900 11.49 x ≈ N/A N/A 280 grids1x1 minimum c 0.79 x x Y XX x unk unk unk XX XX N/A N/A 11000 c 10.68
IT MED 81600 39.22 - > 389 778 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 1.64 - >> N Y U2 - bad bad bad U2 U2 - U1 - genuine genuine 38900 b 37.77
RO STE 300 100 = ≈ 2 10 5 grids1x1 minimum b 100 = 5 grids1x1 Y FV = good good good FV FV = FV noChange noChange 200 b 100
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range		 Trend FRR Min Max Best value Unit Status
Population		 Trend FRP Unit Status
Hab. for
species		 Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status
Future
prosp.		 Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 2012 CS 2012 CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 2001-06 status
with
backcasting		 Target 1
EU28 ALP 23600 0MS - 23600 53 grids1x1 0MS x 53 grids1x1 0MS = 0MS MTX x U1 x nc nc U1 D

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 BLS 8300 0MS = 8300 118 grids1x1 0MS - 118 grids1x1 0MS x 0MS MTX x U2 - nong nong U2 D

01/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 108600 2XP = 804 877 834.50 grids1x1 2XP - 2XP - 2XP MTX - U1 - nc nc U1 C

04/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 MED 208071.84 2XP - 32298 38771 35534.5 grids1x1 2XP - 2XP - 2XP MTX - U1 - nc nc U1 C

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 STE 300 0MS = ≈ 300 2 10 5 grids1x1 0MS = 5 grids1x1 0MS = good good good 0MS MTX = FV nc nong FV A=

04/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State: SK

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 STE 10 0MS = >> 300 0MS MTX FV FV 0/2

04/20

University of Bucharest

Institution: University of Bucharest

Member State:

University of Bucharest
RO CON 2 20 2 grids1x1 2XP - >> 300 grids1x1 2XP - poor poor poor 2XP U1 - U1 C 0/2

04/20

University of Bucharest

Institution: University of Bucharest

Member State:

University of Bucharest
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.