Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: 5.1 Gap distance: 20.000m ||
->Population: 6.2 Imputed value from hibernation roosts (n = 4) calculated with rtrim 2.0 ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Acoustic observations at the edge of the area were made between 2015 and 2018 (Etalle, Spa, ...) ||
->Population: The three most important breeding colonies (> 100 ind.) Were discovered in the last three years ||
->HabInfo: Flipo( 2018) shows that the available transit and hunting habitat still seems to be very much present in the continental zone.

Several recent life projects (LIFE pays mosan, Life prairies bocagères, …) have register this species in their objectives. They work on the improvement of hunting sites, breeding colonies, …
https://www.lifepaysmosan.eu/
https://www.lifeprairiesbocageres.eu/ ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Verdoppelung der Anzahl adulter Weibchen in Wochenstuben (Populationsgröße DE, Min., Max., bester Einzelwert), damit Männchen mit berücksichtigt werden ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range based on field observations and extrapolated on experts' opinion ||
->Population: Population numbers in terms of individuals are based on experts' opinion, multiplying female numbers roughly by 2;
Although the population size is slightly increasing, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "unfavorable - inadequate" ||
->HabInfo: Considering pressures and threats, considering the fact that all females occupy a single maternity roost, and considering that hunting areas are deteriorating and fragmented, the habitat quality is evaluated as unfavourable ||
->Future: Although that the population size continues to increase slightly, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "poor" ||
->Conclusion: Although the population size is slightly increasing, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "unfavorable - inadequate" ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: 6.2. Population size is based on report Presetnik et al. 2017, Appendix 7: score number of adult specimen /observation; winter data. ||
->HabInfo: Ocena izhaja iz ekspertnega mnenja za vrsto : Presetnik et al. 2017. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report