Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: 5.1 Gap Distance: 20.000m ||
->Population: 6.2 Imputed value from hibernation roosts (n = 42) calculated with rtrim 2.0

6.11 Due to missing monitoring data for the years 1995-1996, the analysis of the long-term population trend using rtrim was only possible from 1997 onwards

6.12 Population trend was calculated for hibernation roosts with rtrim 2.0.
1) Trend hibernation roosts: strong increase (p < 0.01), 9 % increase per year (SE 1.52), 42 sites, 342 counts ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Se ha producido un reajuste de las cuadrículas con nuevas aportaciones a las ya registradas del sexenio anterior (2007-2012). El aumento del rango es por tanto debido a una mejora del conocimiento disponible. ||
->Population: Es muy escasa la información disponible sobre las poblaciones en la región Alpina. Los censos realizados en Cataluña, Aragón y Navarra corresponden a estudios de cuevas y edificios antiguos muy localizados donde existen refugios y colonias. El número de individuos podría estar muy subestimado y serían necesarios censos más robustos para realizar estimas poblacionales para toda la región Alpina. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: La population va dépendre en parie des apports extérieurs, et le devenir de l'habitat va dépendre de l'entretien des granges et de la protection des grottes ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: 6.2. Population size is based on report Presetnik et al. 2017, Appendix 7: score number of adult specimen /observation; winter data. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Se ha producido un reajuste de las cuadrículas con nuevas aportaciones a las ya registradas del sexenio anterior (2007-2012). El aumento del rango es por tanto debido a una mejora del conocimiento disponible. ||
->Population: Los individuos y localidades registrados en este informe se corresponden con los censos recientes realizados en Cantabria y en Navarra (Molleda & Fombellida, 2018), por lo que el resto de individuos y localidades posibles de las demás regiones no están incluidos y el número total debería ser mayor. ||
->HabInfo: El hábitat de la especie se ha visto degradado en los últimos 40 años debido a la destrucción de cuevas, edificios y construcciones antiguas (molinos, desvanes, edificios históricos) que utilizan los murciélagos para instalar sus refugios y colonias (Molleda & Fombellida, 2018). ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: Si un effort de conservation a été fait sur les gîtes, les terrains de chasse sont encore trop mal gérés. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Information on population in this region is very scarse ||
->HabInfo: GIS data and information on micro-habitat requirements is generally insuficient to provide a reliable and meaningful estimate. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Short term trend in range has been assessed by using the 2019 distribution data and the 2013 method for calculating range, and comparing the result with range surface area in 2013. For further information see the 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document and country assessments. ||
->Population: The UK National Bat Monitoring Programme (NBMP) has detected increases in both the maternity and hibernation indices and these changes have been consistent over this reporting period. For further information see the 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document. ||
->HabInfo: This species uses a mosaic of habitats. Given that the population appears to be increasing and the range is stable, the habitat can also be considered to be stable. ||
->Future: Future trend in Range is Positive - increasing <=1% (one percent or less) per year on average; Future trend in Population is Very Positive - increasing >1% (more than one percent) per year on average; and Future trend in Habitat for the species is Overall stable. For further information on how future trends inform the Future Prospects conclusion see the 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document. ||
->Conclusion: Conclusion on Range reached because: (i) the short-term trend direction in Range surface area is increasing; and (ii) the current Range surface area is approximately equal to the Favourable Reference Range.
Conclusion on Population reached because: (i) the short-term trend direction in Population size is increasing; and (ii) the current Population size is approximately equal to the Favourable Reference Population.
Conclusion on Habitat for the species reached because: (i) the area of [occupied habitat is [sufficiently large and (ii) the habitat quality is suitable for the long-term survival of the species; and (iii) the short-term trend in area and quality of habitat is stable.
Conclusion on Future prospects reached because: (i) the Future prospects for Range are good; (ii) the Future prospects for Population good; and (iii) the Future prospects for Habitat for the species are good.
Overall assessment of Conservation Status is Favourable because all of the conclusions are Favourable.
Overall trend in Conservation Status is based on the combination of the short-term trends for Range - increasing, Population - increasing, and Habitat for the species - stable.
Overall assessment of Conservation Status has not changed since 2013.
The overall trend in conservation status was not reported for this species in 2013. However, from the information available the overall trend would have been increasing in 2013 and so there has been no change since the last reporting round. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: 5.1 Gap distance: 20.000m ||
->Population: 6.2 Imputed value from hibernation roosts (n = 4) calculated with rtrim 2.0 ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Acoustic observations at the edge of the area were made between 2015 and 2018 (Etalle, Spa, ...) ||
->Population: The three most important breeding colonies (> 100 ind.) Were discovered in the last three years ||
->HabInfo: Flipo( 2018) shows that the available transit and hunting habitat still seems to be very much present in the continental zone.

Several recent life projects (LIFE pays mosan, Life prairies bocagères, …) have register this species in their objectives. They work on the improvement of hunting sites, breeding colonies, …
https://www.lifepaysmosan.eu/
https://www.lifeprairiesbocageres.eu/ ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Verdoppelung der Anzahl adulter Weibchen in Wochenstuben (Populationsgröße DE, Min., Max., bester Einzelwert), damit Männchen mit berücksichtigt werden ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range based on field observations and extrapolated on experts' opinion ||
->Population: Population numbers in terms of individuals are based on experts' opinion, multiplying female numbers roughly by 2;
Although the population size is slightly increasing, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "unfavorable - inadequate" ||
->HabInfo: Considering pressures and threats, considering the fact that all females occupy a single maternity roost, and considering that hunting areas are deteriorating and fragmented, the habitat quality is evaluated as unfavourable ||
->Future: Although that the population size continues to increase slightly, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "poor" ||
->Conclusion: Although the population size is slightly increasing, the fact that all breeding females are located in only one single colony is to be considered as a major threat, thus the population parameter is evaluated as "unfavorable - inadequate" ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: 6.2. Population size is based on report Presetnik et al. 2017, Appendix 7: score number of adult specimen /observation; winter data. ||
->HabInfo: Ocena izhaja iz ekspertnega mnenja za vrsto : Presetnik et al. 2017. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: The species range was poorly known before 2012. Thus, estimation of a range trend is not possible. The species surface area of range was miscalculated in the previous report. ||
->Population: The species population size was poorly known before 2012. Thus, estimation of a population trend is not possible. ||
->HabInfo: The species habitat sufficiency (area and/or quality) was poorly known before 2012. Thus, estimation of a habitat trend is chancy, but there is no data to justify that it has improved the past 12 years. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: El mayor número de efectivos y colonias de cría se localizan en Andalucía, Castilla la Mancha, Madrid y Comunidad Valenciana. Las localidades donde se han identificado los refugios y colonias están distribuidos por toda la región Mediterránea y de manera muy dispersa. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: Le développement de l'éclairage nocturne va poser problème ainsi que celui es infrastructures routières. La gestion des sites hypogés est prioritaire. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Many unknown colonies may be present. Seasonal movement not taken in account. ||
->HabInfo: The surface area of the habitat is estimated at 89575 km2, the area of suitable habitat is 98825 km2 and its quality is good.
Forages on a variety of habitats, roosts in caves and mines which are abundant, but threatened. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: For this species not enough data were collected during the period 2001-2014. Thus, the distribution, range, population size, habitat area and suitable habitat area were calculated or estimated using the most recent qualitative and quantitative data.
The data of the geographical distribution and range of the species are based on recent bibliographic and field data that have been tested for their accuracy.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The available information only allows the estimation of a minimal population size ||
->HabInfo: GIS data and information on micro-habitat requirements is generally insuficient to provide a reliable and meaningful estimate. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: As the population increases only on thoose bat roosts, which are under conservation management and decreses on unmanaged bat roost, this is rather colonisation. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Rhinolophus ferrumequinum"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report