Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: In the federal state of Vorarlberg the occurrences of the species are allochthonous. The population belongs to the South European species Podarcis muralis maculiventris zurück (Aschauer et al. 2008).

The occurrences in the federal state of Salzburg are also allochthonous.

Both populations aren't included into range calculations. ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Übernahme Länderangabe ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Not reported during previous reporting period. ||
->Population: Podarcis muralis is not native to this area. Any change in range or population is most likely biased, as numerous new populations continue to be discovered and previously discovered ones are not revisited within each reporting period. ||
->HabInfo: This non-native species colonises habitat types of which large quantities of comparable quality are still available to be colonised. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: No previous reporting available. This species is not native to this area. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Verschneidung der Vorkommenspunkt (Distribution) mit grids1x1 und Habitatmaskierung mit CorineLandCover-Klassen ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: La tendencia general en el estado de conservación se considera positiva dada la capacidad colonizadora observada. Se han registrado nuevas cuadrículas ocupadas por Podarcis muralis en Galicia recientemente, de lo que se puede inferir una ligera expansión de su área de dustribución por colonización de nuevas áreas (Galán, 2005; Cabana et al., 2016). ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: De natuurlijke populatie bevindt zich in twee 10*10 km hokken, net als in de vorige rapportage periode.
Daarnaast is de soort op veel plaatsen uitgezet, maar dit is allemaal buiten het oorspronkelijk verspreidingsgebied van de soort en is daarom niet meegerekend. Een aantal uitzettingen slaat aan door klimaatseffecten. ||
->Population: Vorige schatting was een nauwkeurige aantalsschatting, deze is nu vervangen door 1*1 km grid. Niettemin gaat de soort onmiskenbaar vooruit, al is de huidige populatiegrootte nog lang niet optimaal voor een hagedis.
De populatietrend is berekend door het CBS op basis van aantalsmonitoring uit het NEM. Deze soort wordt geteld middels aantallen subadulte en volwassen dieren. ||
->HabInfo: De soort breidt zich nog steeds uit en in diverse richtingen liggen zeer kansrijke habitats en potentiële leefgebieden, deze warmteminnende soort profiteert daarbij van klimaatopwarming en warmere zomers ||
->Future: Populatiegrootte is, voor een hagedis en ondanks de uitbreidingen nog steeds poor.
Habitat: Soort kan profiteren van klimaatopwarming, is echter niet erg mobiel. Verspreidt zich dan ook langzaam vanuit de natuurlijke populatie. Doet het tegenwoordig goed buiten zijn natuurlijke verspreidingsgebied a.g.v. illegale introducties. ||
->Conclusion: De aantallen zijn nog steeds veel te laag voor een hagedis, al wordt het wel steeds robuuster (in de jaren tachtig waren er nog minder dan 80 adulten over, nu zijn dat er ca. 10 keer zoveel). Maakt de soort echter wel gevoelig voor calamiteiten, met name dierziektes. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: The occurrences in Upper Austria (region of Oberes Donautal) are allochthonous and are not included in the range calculation. ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Trend estimation by list-length analysis shows up a significant -16% long term decline of the species observation probability when visiting favourable grids within 24 years (-0,67% per year); the numbers of individuals seen by observers seem to decrease slighly over the periods (decreasing medians by period) ||
->HabInfo: Many favourable sunny rocky habitats disappear due to natural succession; some were restored by tree and bush cutting during the last two six-year cycle in the framework of Life projects, but it is not known if it compensated the loss during the same interval. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: Species discovered at third site. Individuals are most likely introduced.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Verschneidung der Vorkommenspunkt (Distribution) mit grids1x1 und Habitatmaskierung mit CorineLandCover-Klassen ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Area and short-term trend are based on species distribution models for the periods 2007-2012 and 2013-2018, based on both casual and standardised species observations.
Survey efforts since 2013 has led to a large increase in species distribution knowledge, mostly filling gaps between known populations.
Change in reported values is due to the use of a different resolution in the range tool (grids5x5 in 2013 and grids10x10 in 2019). ||
->Population: Population size: estimation based on species distribution modelling from presence data in the 2013-2018 period. Unit = grids 1x1. The maximum corresponds to the number of suitable grid cells provided by the model. The minimum is the maximum value multiplied by the naïve site occupancy during our monitoring (88/170=52%).
Short-term trend: estimation based on the 137 grids1x1 surveyed both in 2010-2012 and in 2016-2018 in the frame of a dedicated monitoring. Unit = grids1x1. The species was present in 62 grids in 2010-2012 and in 65 grids in 2016-2018 (+5%), which is considered as stable (less than 1% change per year). Based on expert's opinion, the number of individuals by population is likely increasing as well. However, the density of suitable habitats and hence the population size in terms of individuals is still considered far below the historical situation.
Change in reported values are mainly due to the use of a different unit (grids5x5 in 2013 and grids1x1 in 2019). ||
->HabInfo: Based on repeated surveys of a sample of sites, the habitat quality is considered as stable. A part of the occupied sites are however subject to natural succession, but without substantially affecting the habitat quality at the scale of the short-term trend period (2010-2018). Based on expert's opinion, important works have recently undertaken on railways allowing a recolonisation of the species. The species is well represented in the dry walls of the vinyards. Some examples of dry wall restauration projects followed by colonisation of the species have been observed. However, the density of suitable habitats is still considered far below the historical situation. ||
->Future: A growing attention is given in the protection and the restauration of dry walls. In addition, the global reduction of chemicals in vinyards and in public areas should be beneficial for the species. However, the species still requires attention in the development of infrastructures outside protected areas. ||
->Conclusion: Species which followed some decline in former years but nowadays likely to be improving thanks to conservation measures and potentially thanks to climate change. A dedicated monitoring provided more accurate data. Special care are still required in habitat management and development projects. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Le Lézard des murailles est absent de Corse; nous avons donc supprimé toutes les occurrences sur la carte en Corse. De fait, comment va être calculée la superficie de l'espèce en zone méditerranéenne ? ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: C'est l'essor de la Tarente en zone méditerranéenne qui nous amène à suggérer une tendance négative et une perspective médiocre pour la rubrique "Population". ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The mean from a number (N=107) of population density measurements was extrapolated to the total area of distribution.
The statistical power of the approach used was low for a widely distributed species. Also there can be significant fluctuations in population density depending on the season. Expressing the results as a class was a safer option.
The population size in 6.2.d has been calculated in GIS using spatial information from the distribution data (10x10 km or smaller grids if additional data were available). Following the conversion of the available data in 1x1 km grid unit, marine or terrestrial grid cells have been deleted and thus excluded from the calculation, depending on the biogeographical region where the species occurs (MED or MMED, respectively). ||
->HabInfo: The surface of the habitat is estimated at 20060 km2 and its quality is good. The area of suitable habitat is 34242 km2. A widely distributed generalist species. Random surveys have been conducted in the distribution areas. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: The range estimations do not include unfavorable altitude areas.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Podarcis muralis"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report