Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Verschneidung der Vorkommenspunkt (Distribution) mit grids1x1 und Habitatmaskierung mit CorineLandCover-Klassen ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Population trend is based on the summerpopulation, this is probably representative for the winterpopulation because it is a sedentary species.

Change in method is to estimate the population size in occupied grid cells in stead of # individuals. ||
->HabInfo: Roosting habitat (e.g. attics) under pressure (preservation of wooden constructions and lighting around churches). Fouraging habitat probably increasing due to maturing forests and sustainable forest management. ||
->Future: Soort is geheel of voornamelijk afhankelijk van gebouwen in zowel zomer als winter en wordt daardoor sterk bedreigd door de verduurzaming van gebouwen.

Specific range; rare species and unknown specifics of hunting habitat. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: GIS data and information on micro-habitat requirements is generally insuficient to provide a reliable and meaningful estimate. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Plecotus austriacus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Short term trend in range has been assessed by using the 2019 distribution data and the 2013 method for calculating range and comparing that with range surface area in 2013. For further details please see the 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document and country assessments. ||
->Population: The 1km square population estimate has been calculated from the UK count of 1km squares where the species has been recorded. This is a minimum count because it only includes number of recorded occupied 1km squares. The confidence limits for the population estimate of number of individuals are wide and methodologies have changed (Mathews et. al., 2018), making it difficult to set an FRP value. A best single value for the population has not been provided because of the level of uncertainty around the population estimate. Instead the lower and upper confidence intervals provide minimum and maximum limits to the population estimate. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: Future trend of Range is Unknown; Future trend of Population is Unknown; and Future trend of Habitat for the species is Unknown. For further information on how future trends inform the Future Prospects conclusion see the 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document. ||
->Conclusion: Conclusion on Range reached because: (i) the short-term trend direction in Range surface area is uncertain; and (ii) the current Range surface area is not less than the Favourable Reference Range .
Conclusion on Population reached because: (i) the short-term trend direction in Population size is unknown; and (ii) the FRP for Population size is more than the current population.
Conclusion on Habitat for the species reached because: (i) the area of occupied and unoccupied habitat is unknown and (ii) the habitat quality is unknown for the long-term survival of the species; and (iii) the short-term trend in area and quality of habitat is unknown.
Conclusion on Future prospects reached because the Future prospects for Range, Population and Habitat for the species are unknown.
Overall assessment of Conservation Status is Unfavourable-Inadequate because one or more of the conclusions is Unfavourable-Inadequate.
Overall trend is Unknown, based on trends for Range, Population and Habitat for the Species.
Overall assessment of Conservation Status has not changed since 2013..
Overall trend in conservation status has changed from declining in 2013 to Unknown because trends in population and habitat for the species have changed from declining to unknown.
||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report