Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Übernahme Länderangabe ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: This species has a wide range in Spain, but microclimate conditions are changing damaging populations. Habitat in alpine areas is well preserved, but future prospects are not good. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Obecnie na terenie Polski samopodtrzymująca się populacja niepylaka apollo występuje na terenie Pienin Właściwych (podgatunek P.apollo frankenbergeri). Powierzchnia zasięgu aktualnego została określona jako powierzchnia zasiedlonych pól 10x10km na mapie rozmieszczenia. Jest to równocześnie zasięg referencyjny. Nie można w nim brać pod uwagę polskiej części Tatr, gdyż pomimo, że z terenu Kominiarskich Wierchów co jakiś czas pojawiają się informacje o obserwacji pojedynczych motyli, jednak mimo badań prowadzonych - z różną intnsywnością - badań od około połowy XIXw nie udało się na tym terenie potwierdzić istnienia stałej populacji (prawdopodobnie obserwowane są osobniki zalatujące ze Slowacji).
Do obliczenia całkowitej powierzchni zasięgu w regionie biogeograficznym użyto standardowego algorytmu IT-tool. ||
->Population: Obecnie na terenie Polski występuje jedna samopodtrzymująca się populacja na terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego.
Populacja ta podlega corocznemu, szczegółowemu monitoringowi obejmującemu liczebność populacji oraz jej strukturę przestrzenną. Uzyskane dane wskazują, że w swoim zasięgu populacja zajmuje większość dostępnych siedlisk i osiąga na nich zagęszczenie wystarczające do wieloletniego utrzymania się (FRP określona poziomie aktualnym). ||
->HabInfo: Siedlisko gatunku stanowią kserotermiczne murawy oraz piarżyska. Na skutek splotu wielu naturalnych i antropogenicznych czynników podlegają one procesom sukcesji, który musi być (i jest) korygowany działaniami ochronnymi. Aktualnie powierzchnia i jakosc zajmowanych siedlisk są wystarczające dla przetrwania gatunku. ||
->Future: Dobre perspektywy ochrony dla wszystkich parametrów (których stan jest obecnie właściwy), wynikają z uwzględnienia niezbędnych zabiegów w Planie Ochrony PPN (Dz. U. 2014. poz 1010). Ich prowadzenie jest zatem zagwarantowane na tym terenie do 2034r..
Wspomniane działania skutecznie niwelują skutki sukcesji ekologicznej (L02) na stanowiskach niepylaka apollo i z tego powodu mimo intensywności oddziaływania (L02) perspektywy ochrony uznano za "dobre" ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: Zasięg i rozmieszczenie:
Jak już wspomniano gatunek na terenie Polski występuje w regionie alpejskim na jednym stałym stanowisku : w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym
Stanowisko w PPN jest ostatnim naturalnym stanowiskiem, które w latach 1992 – 2018 podlega pracom restytucyjnym.
Niejasny jest status stanowisk w Małych Pieninach (rezerwat "Wąwóz Homole"), gdzie po wprowadzeniu w latach 2003-2004 gatunek występował przynajmniej do 2013r.
Równie niejasny jest status stanowiska w polskiej części Tatr, gdzie co kilka lat obserwuje się pojedyncze osobniki.
W ostatniej dekadzie gatunek został wprowadzony na zbliżone do historycznych stanowiska w Karkonoskim Parku Narodowym. Nie uwzględniono ich jeszcze przy określaniu rozmieszczenia gatunku, ponieważ nieznany jest jeszcze sukces restytucji. Brak jeszcze wystarczających danych by stwierdzić, czy obecna metapopulacja dziko-hodowlana może się stać się populacją samopodtrzymującą. Uruchomienie programu restytucji niepylaka apollo na terenie Karkonoskiego Parku Narodowego w oparciu o materiał pochodzący z Pienińskiego PN pozwoliło na stworzenie sztuczno-hodowlanej metapopulacji refugialnej, która może zostać wykorzysta w przypadku wystąpienia nieprzewidzianych katastrofalnych zmian stanu populacji na głównym obszarze występowania gatunku w Polsce - Pieninach.
Ocena stanu zasięgu bez zmian od poprzedniego raportu (FV).

Populacja:
Pełną informacją dysponujemy jedynie dla populacji z terenu Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego, która podlega stałemu precyzyjnemu monitoringowi. Do roku 2006 była ona wspomagana osobnikami z hodowli utworzonej na bazie rodzimego materiału. Od roku 2007 pomimo zaprzestania tego wspomagania utrzymuje ona mniej więcej stałą (choć podlegającą wahaniom) liczebność i strukturę przestrzenną. Jednak jej status uzależniony jest od utrzymania odpowiedniego stanu siedliska.
Z kolei populacja restytuowana na terenie Karkonoskiego PN, w oparciu o materiał pozyskany z Pienin, tworzy wraz z hodowlą w Sycowie tzw. "metapopulację dziko-hodowlaną". W chwili obecnej brak jeszcze wystarczających danych by stwierdzić czy może ona stać sie populacją samopodtrzymującą.
Ocena stanu populacji bez zmian od poprzedniego raportu (FV).

Siedlisko gatunku:
Siedlisko gatunku stanowią kserotermiczne murawy oraz piarżyska. Niestety na skutek spolotu naturalnych i antropogennych czynników podlegają one intensywnemu zarastaniu przez krzewy (głownie tarninę) oraz drzewa. Proces ten powstrzymywany jest przez aktywne zabiegi prowadzone na stanowiskach, a ich wykonywanie wpisane zostało do Planu Ochrony Pienińskiego Paki Narodowego. Można zatem uznać, że utrzymanie odpowiedniego stanu siedliska jest zapewnione do końca jego obowiązywania (2034r). W związku z tym stan siedliska oceniono aktualnie lepiej (FV) niż w raporcie 2013 (U1).
Perspektywy ochrony:
Perspektywy ochrony uzależnione są przede wszystkim od stanu zachowania siedlisk. Na terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego działania takie zostały wpisane w "Plan Ochrony Parku", co zabezpiecza ich realizację do 2034r. Poza obszarami chronionymi zabiegi takie raczej nie są prowadzone ze względu na znaczny koszt oraz brak pozaprzyrodniczych korzyści z ich podejmowania.
Ocena perspektyw bez zmian od poprzedniego raportu (FV).

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: This butterly has already local extinctions documented in the Basque Country in places where it was found 30 years ago. ||
->HabInfo: There is a sufficiently large area of unoccupied habitat with apparently suitable quality, but climate and microclimate factors make this places inadequate for Parnassius apollo.
This butterly has already local extinctions documented in the Basque Country in places where it was found 30 years ago. ||
->Future: This butterly has already local extinctions documented in the Basque Country in places where it was found 30 years ago.
Future prospects in the Atlantic area are locally not good. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range is calculated from observations recorded in Swedish Species Observation System, 'Artportalen'. Known range has increased since 2013 due to new reports from previously unknown localities.
The range of Parnassius apollo started to decline in Sweden already in the first half of the 20th century and has later resulted in complete extinction in many parts of its former range. The present range has been rather stable the last 12 years, but when extending the period around 24 years genuine losses have occurred in the western part of Sweden around the lake Vänern. This area went extinct in the late 1980 or early 1990-ties and is included in the FRR. ||
->Population: Population is calculated from data reported by the public and monitoring programs financed by authorities. Data accessed from Swedish Species Observation System, 'Artportalen'. Data from a representative time frame is used to calculate the number of localities present. From monitoring programs data can population sizes from certain localities can be estimated. By multiplying these two assessments a value of the total population is attained.
The population (individuals) on Gotland dominates the boreal region, maybe compromising 75-90% of the population. Less dominating when counted as 1x1 km squares. The population on Gotland is rather stable, while the mainland population decreases.
The assumed decline in population is within the range of reported individuals. Thus, there is no change compared to 2013 in the number of reported individuals. Population was 2013 reported as individuals, 2019 this parameter is used in the additional population size 6.4, trends, and FRP. ||
->HabInfo: P. apollo is divided into separated populations in the Swedish boreal region. Two remain today, one on the eastern mainland, and one on the island Gotland. The typical habitat on mainland is coastal habitats on granite bedrock. The habitat on Gotland is open calcareous bedrocks (alvar).
The habitat in Sweden have gradually declined during the 20th century. Particularly for the subspecies P. a. scandinavicus inhabiting the mainland’s coastal regions. The habitat has gradually deteriorated probably due to changes in grazing of dry and nutrient-poor grasslands. On contrary, good habitat for the subspecies P. a. apollo still exists in open calcareous bedrocks of island Gotland.
The area and quality are probably decreasing due changes in grassland management. So, the assessment for mainland is; area ‘decreasing’ / quality ‘decreasing’ on short term as well as long term. The habitat on Gotland is stable.
The species is not severely fragmented according to IUCN criteria. ||
->Future: Current status is bad for range and population and inadequate for habitat. All parameters have a negative short-term trends. Restoration of the species habitat is a relatively slow process so if habitat reduction ceases the situation will probably not change much over a relative short period of 12 years. Thus future prospect is similar to present conclusions, however habitat will get bad future prospects according to guidelines. ||
->Conclusion: No changes compared to previous report. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: P. apollo is redlisted as near threatened (NT) in Sweden (2015), same as in earlier redlists (2000, 2005, 2010). The subspecies P. a. scandinavicus was redlisted as endangered (EN) (2005, 2010, 2015), while the subspecies P. a. apollo was redlisted as near threatened (NT) (2005, 2010, 2015). Suggested redlist category 2020 is same as previous.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: The species has become extinct in the continental region within the current reporting period. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Reintroduced population. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Methodik zur Ermittlung der Populationsgröße in EU-Einheit: Hochrechnung aus Länderangaben in DE- und EU-Populationseinheit ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: There is a sufficiently large area of unoccupied habitat with apparently suitable quality, but climate and microclimate factors make these places inadequate for Parnassius apollo.
Since 1996 decline has been documented at Sierra de Guadarrama.
Southernmost populations are endangered becouse of climate change. Some of them are already extinct. ||
->Future: There is a sufficiently large area of unoccupied habitat with apparently suitable quality, but climate and microclimate factors make these places inadequate for Parnassius apollo.
Since 1996 decline has been documented at Sierra de Guadarrama.
Southernmost populations are endangered becouse of climate change. Some of them are already extinct. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Sampling localities were visited only once in 2014 and 2015. In absence of time series data, we considered (a) expert opinion of known population localities since 2007, (b) population localities from the Greek butterfly atlas and other bibliographic or unpublished records, (c) the proportion % of species presence in the localities visited in 2014 and 2015 (filtering only for adequate localities in terms of phenology), in order to provide an estimation of minimum and maximum population size (population classes).
The population size in 6.2.d has been calculated in GIS using spatial information from the distribution data (10x10 km or smaller grids if additional data were available). Following the conversion of the available data in 1x1 km grid unit, marine or terrestrial grid cells have been deleted and thus excluded from the calculation, depending on the biogeographical region where the species occurs (MED or MMED, respectively). ||
->HabInfo: The surface area of the habitat is estimated at 1661 km2, the area of suitable habitat is 3159 km2 and its quality is unknown. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: The species is no longer present in several localities, however, the time of disappearance is not certain. The population and range decline is definitely present, however it is not know in which time period. ||
->Population: The species is no longer present in several localities, however, the time of disappearance is not certain. The population and range decline is definitely present, however it is not know in which time period. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Parnassius apollo"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report