Article 17 web tool

Log in
Article 17 > Species summary

Species assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a species belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that species.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The 'Data sheet info' includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per species.

The 'Audit trail' includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Warning: The map does not show the distribution for sensitive species in DE, PL

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad

Sensitive spatial information for this species is not shown in the map.

Current selection: 2013-2018, Arthropods, Coenonympha oedippus, All bioregions. Annexes Y, Y, N. Show all Arthropods
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Population Habitat for the species Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution
area (km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRR
Min
Member State
code		 Reporting units Alternative units
Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate Min Max Best value Unit Type of estimate
AT 2 N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum 63 N/A N/A i minimum
SI 3 6 N/A grids1x1 estimate 500 1000 N/A i estimate
FR 191 19100 N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A minimum
BG N/A N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
AT 2 N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum 8 N/A N/A i minimum
DE 5 5 N/A grids1x1 estimate 100 500 300 i estimate
FR 3 300 N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A minimum
IT N/A N/A 79 grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
PL 21 29 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A 10 localities estimate
SI 118 121 N/A grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
HR N/A N/A 8 grids1x1 estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A
HU N/A N/A 17 grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A N/A
FR 3 300 N/A grids1x1 minimum N/A N/A N/A minimum
IT N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Max
Best value Unit Type est. Method Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRP Unit Occupied
suff.		 Unoccupied
suff.		 Status Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 Distrib. Method % MS
AT ALP 100 21.74 = >> 2 N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum a 30.77 x >> N N U2 = bad bad bad U2 U2 = U2 x noChange knowledge 100 a 50
SI ALP 360 78.26 = > 3 6 N/A grids1x1 estimate a 69.23 - >> N N U2 - poor bad bad U2 U2 - U2 - noChange noChange 100 b 50
FR ATL 28200 100 + ≈ 191 19100 N/A grids1x1 minimum b 100 x x Y FV + good unk unk XX FV = U1 - genuine noChange 20100 a 100
BG BLS N/A 0 x 200 N/A N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum c 0 x x N Unk XX u unk unk unk XX XX x FV method method 200 b 100
AT CON 100 0.70 = >> 2 N/A N/A grids1x1 minimum a 0.52 x >> N N U2 = bad bad bad U2 U2 = U2 x noChange knowledge 100 a 1.59
DE CON 400 2.79 = >> 5 5 N/A grids1x1 estimate a 1.31 = >> i N N U2 = bad bad bad U2 U2 = U2 = noChange noChange 300 a 4.76
FR CON 500 3.49 = >> 3 300 N/A grids1x1 minimum b 39.66 = x Y FV = unk unk good XX U2 = U2 = noChange noChange 300 a 4.76
IT CON 11500 80.20 = ≈ N/A N/A 79 grids1x1 estimate a 20.68 = ≈ Y U1 - good good poor U1 U1 - U1 = noChange knowledge 3700 b 58.73
PL CON 700 4.88 = x 21 29 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 6.54 = > N Unk U1 = unk poor poor U1 U1 = U1 - noChange knowledge 700 b 11.11
SI CON 1140 7.95 = >> 118 121 N/A grids1x1 estimate b 31.28 - > N N U2 - poor bad bad U2 U2 - U2 - noChange noChange 1200 b 19.05
HR MED 300 100 = >> N/A N/A 8 grids1x1 estimate a 100 = >> N Unk U2 - bad bad bad U2 U2 - N/A N/A 300 a 100
HU PAN 700 100 + > N/A N/A 17 grids1x1 minimum a 100 = > N Y U1 u poor unk poor U1 U1 = U1 + noChange knowledge 700 a 100
FR ALP 700 0 x x 3 300 N/A grids1x1 minimum b 0 x x Unk Unk XX x unk unk unk XX XX x N/A N/A noChange noChange 100 a 0
IT ALP 6400 0 N N/ N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N N/ N/A N N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2100 b 0
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range		 Trend FRR Min Max Best value Unit Status
Population		 Trend FRP Unit Status
Hab. for
species		 Trend Range
prosp.		 Population
prosp.		 Hab. for sp.
prosp.		 Status
Future
prosp.		 Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 2012 CS 2012 CS
trend		 Status
Nat. of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 2001-06 status
with
backcasting		 Target 1
EU28 ALP 460 2GD = >> grids1x1 0EQ - >> 0EQ - 0EQ MTX - U2 - nc nc U2 C

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 ATL 28200 0MS + ≈ 191 19100 grids1x1 0MS x x 0MS + good unk unk 0MS MTX = U1 - gen gen U1 A+

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 BLS 0MS x 200 grids1x1 0MS x x 0MS x unk unk unk 0MS MTX x XX nc nong XX D

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 14340 2XP = >> 228 536 382 grids1x1 2XP - >> 2XP - 2XP MTX - U2 - nc nc U2 C

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 MED 300 0MS = >> 8 grids1x1 0MS = >> 0MS - bad bad bad 0MS MTX - XX x nong nong C

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 PAN 700 0MS + > 17 grids1x1 0MS = > 0MS x poor unk poor 0MS MTX = U1 + nc nong U1 D

01/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.