Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: Estimates based on damage records The number of wolves fluctuated between seasons and years.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: Sans objet pour une espèce plastique non inféodée à des caractéristiques d'habitats particuliers ||
->Future: Les tendances (aire de répartition et population) dépendent des mesures de gestion appliquées par l'Etat. Aujourd'hui l'objectif est d'atteindre un seuil minimal de 500 individus. Un seuil de 10 % de l'effectif estimé annuellement est actuellement autorisé par arrêté ministériel à titre dérogatoire. ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: All available range in the alpine region is already inhabited by wolves and further range expansion is not possible. ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: Both, short term and long term trend of the size and the quality of available
habitat is increasing due to general, long term progression of forest succession
caused by abandoning of rural areas and decrease of grazing and browsing
pressure. The infrastructure (primary highways) devolepment has not caused
habitat fragmanetation, while the loss of suitable habitat due to these
constructions is less than overall progress of vegetation succession.
Literature:
Huber, Đ., Kusak, J., 2000. Highway Bregana-Zagreb-Dubrovnik: Environmental
impact study on large carnivores: Sections: Bosiljevo-Sveti Rok.
Kusak, J., Huber, D., Frkovic, A., Frković, A., 2000. The effects of traffic on large
carnivore populations in Croatia. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION 3,
35–39.
Kusak, J., 2002. Uvjeti za život vuka (Canis lupus L.) u Hrvatskoj. Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb.247 pp.
Kusak, J., Singer, D., Desnica, S., 2005. Vjerojatnost pojavljivanja vuka u
Hrvatskoj. LIFE III VUK projekt, GIS karta, DZZP, Zagreb.
Štrbenac, A., Huber, Đ., Kusak, J., Majić Skrbinšek, A., Frković, A., Štahan, Ž.,
Jeremić-Martinko, J., Desnica, S., Štrbenac, P., Majić-Skrbinšek, A., Frković, A.,
Štahan, Ž., Jeremić-Martinko, J., Desnica, S., Štrbenac, P., 2005. Wolf
management plan for Croatia. Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb
Kusak, J., Huber, Đ., Trenc, N., Desnica, S., Jeremić, J., 2016. Stručni priručnik za
procjenu utjecaja zahvata na velike zvijeri pojedinačno te u sklopu planskih
dokumenata Verzija 1.0 - primjer vjetroelektrane. Croatian Agency for
Environment and Nature, Zagreb 61 pp

Kusak, J., Huber, D., Gomerčić, T., Schwaderer, G., Gužvica, G., 2009. The
permeability of highway in Gorski kotar (Croatia) for large mammals. European
Journal of Wildlife Research 55, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0208-
5

Kusak, J., Prohaska, A., Huber, Đ., Vukšić, I., 2009. Highway constructions and
maintenance of large mammals habitat continuity – a Croatian experience, in:
Jedrzejewski, W., Lawreszuk, D. (Eds.), Materiały konferencji międzynarodowej
“Wdrażanie koncepcji korytarzy ekologicznych w Polsce” Białowieża, 20-22 XI
2008. Mammal Research Institute, pp. 51–59
Kusak, J., Huber, Đ., Trenc, N., Desnica, S., Jeremić, J., 2016. Stručni priručnik za
procjenu utjecaja zahvata na velike zvijeri pojedinačno te u sklopu planskih
dokumenata Verzija 1.0 - primjer vjetroelektrane. Croatian Agency for
Environment and Nature, Zagreb 61 pp. ||
->Future: The range in the Alpine region is expected not to increase since all available
range is alrady ocupied. Range within alpine region may increase only if the
succesion of forest will advance and create more of suitable habitat withiht the
region.
Ref:
Kusak, J., Huber, Ð., Huber, Đ., 2010. Dinamika, brojnost i trend populacije vuka
od 1992. do 2008. godine, in: Štrbenac, A. (Ed.), Plan Upravljanja Vukom u
Republici Hrvatskoj. DZZP, Zagreb, pp. 19–21.
Kusak, J., Huber, Đ., 2010. Rasprostranjenost, in: Plan upravljanja vukom u
Republici Hrvatskoj za razdoblje 2010 - 2015. Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode,
Zagreb, pp. 14–15.
Population is under the pressure and the main future threat is illegal killing due
to low acceptance.
Ref:
Majić, A., Bath, A.J., 2010. Changes in attitudes toward wolves in Croatia.
Biological Conservation 143, 255–260.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.010

The pressure of habitat fragmentation due to highways construction has been
mitigated, but new threats are plans for the renewable energy (wind and solar)
development within the range and often inside core areas of wolf range, then
increasing tourism and recreation in wolf range. Additional new pressure and
threat are fencing of borders due to tide of migrants and the movemnt of
migrants through wolf habitat.
Ref:
Kusak, J., Huber, D., Gomerčić, T., Schwaderer, G., Gužvica, G., 2009. The
permeability of highway in Gorski kotar (Croatia) for large mammals. European
Journal of Wildlife Research 55, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0208-
5
Kusak, J., Prohaska, A., Huber, Đ., Vukšić, I., 2009. Highway constructions and
maintenance of large mammals habitat continuity – a Croatian experience, in:
Jedrzejewski, W., Lawreszuk, D. (Eds.), Materiały konferencji międzynarodowej
“Wdrażanie koncepcji korytarzy ekologicznych w Polsce” Białowieża, 20-22 XI
2008. Mammal Research Institute, pp. 51–59
Linnell, J.D.C., Trouwborst, A., Boitani, L., Kaczensky, P., Huber, D., Reljic, S.,
Kusak, J., Majic, A., Skrbinsek, T., Potocnik, H., Hayward, M.W., Milner-Gulland,
E.J., Buuveibaatar, B., Olson, K.A., Badamjav, L., Bischof, R., Zuther, S.,
Breitenmoser, U., 2016. Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the
Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia? PLoS Biology 14, 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.100248 ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: W porównaniu do niniejszego raportu w raportach z 2007 r. i z 2013 r. wykazano mniejszy zasięg gatunku. Różnica ta wynika z zastosowania innej metodyki. Aktualnie, zgodnie z wytycznymi, zasięg został wyznaczony przyjmując, że przerwy w rozmieszczeniu gatunku sięgające do 40 km wliczane są do zasięgu występowania gatunku. W poprzednich raportach przerwy w rozmieszczeniu, które były wliczane do zasięgu gatunku, wynosiły maksymalnie 30 km. Biorąc pod uwagę rozmieszczenie gatunku, które nie zmieniało się istotnie, należy uznać, że zasięg jest stabilny. ||
->Population: Liczebność gatunku została oszacowana na podstawie ekstrapolacji zagęszczeń populacji stwierdzonych na stanowiskach monitoringowych w regionie alpejskim na cały obszar rozmieszczenia gatunku w tym regionie.W raporcie z 2007 r. liczebność wilka określono na 180-220 osobników, a w raporcie z 2013 r. na 200-300 osobników. Aktualnie oszacowana liczebność wynosi 294 osobniki, czyli mieści się w granicach wyznaczonych w poprzednim raporcie i dlatego uznano, że populacja jest stabilna. ||
->HabInfo: W poprzednich raportach powierzchnia siedliska została określona jako udział terenów leśnych w obrębie zasięgu gatunku. Stosując tę samą metodę określenia powierzchni siedliska należałoby uznać, że powierzchnia siedliska zwiększyła się. Wzrost ten jednak jest pozorny, gdyż wynika tylko ze zwiększenia się zasięgu występowania gatunku na co wpływ miała zmiana metody określania zasięgu. Najważniejszym czynnikiem mogącym pogorszyć stan siedliska gatunku jest rozwój zabudowy mieszkaniowej i rekreacyjnej oraz rozwój infrastruktury drogowej. W porównywanym okresie stan siedliska nie pogorszył się istotnie. Przy ocenie stanu siedliska wykorzystano dane Państwowego Monitoringu Przyrodniczego GIOŚ. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The spatial unit used for wolf population monitoring is different from the biogeographical unit. About half of the wolf packs in Slovenia have territories stretching across the two biogeographical regions. The population growth rate for the whole of Slovenia between 2010 and 2018 is 92% (the population size estimate is 39 individuals for 2010, and 75 individuals for 2018).
Population growth is partly due to spatial expansion and a greater number of wolf packs and partly due to the fact that several wolf packs developed a vital structure and have more members. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Canis lupus"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report