Article 17 web tool

Species assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU 25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012, in EU 28 for the period 2013-2018 and in EU 27 for the period 2019-2024.

Choose a period, a group, then a species belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that species.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The 'Data sheet info' includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per species.

The 'Audit trail' includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

IMPORTANT: Due to late delivery by Greece of the Article 17 report for 2007-2012 period, 2000-2006 Greek data have been used for EU biogeographical assessment and are displayed on this page. To consult 2007-2012 data from Greece filter 'Period' = '2007-2012bis'.

Period... 2001-20062007-20122007-2012bis2013-2018

Group... -AmphibiansArthropodsFishMammalsMolluscsNon-vascular plantsOther invertebratesReptilesVascular plants

Name... -Alytes cisternasiiAlytes muletensisAlytes obstetricansBombina bombinaBombina variegataBufo calamitaBufo viridisChioglossa lusitanicaDiscoglossus galganoiDiscoglossus jeanneaeDiscoglossus montalentiiDiscoglossus pictusDiscoglossus sardusEuproctus asperEuproctus montanusEuproctus platycephalusHydromantes ambrosiiHydromantes flavusHydromantes geneiHydromantes imperialisHydromantes strinatiiHydromantes supramontisHyla arboreaHyla meridionalisHyla sardaHyla savignyiMertensiella luschaniPelobates cultripesPelobates fuscusPelobates fuscus insubricusPelobates syriacusProteus anguinusRana arvalisRana bedriagaeRana dalmatinaRana esculentaRana graecaRana ibericaRana italicaRana latasteiRana lessonaeRana pereziRana ridibundaRana temporariaSalamandra atraSalamandra atra auroraeSalamandra lanzaiSalamandrina terdigitataTriturus carnifexTriturus cristatusTriturus dobrogicusTriturus italicusTriturus kareliniiTriturus macedonicusTriturus marmoratusTriturus montandoniTriturus vulgaris ampelensis

Bio-region... All bioregionsAlpineBlack SeaContinentalPannonianSteppic

Filter

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Current selection: 2007-2012, Amphibians, Triturus dobrogicus, Pannonian. Annexes II. Show all Amphibians

Treated data from Member States reports
MS		Range (km2)				Population				Habitat for the species (km2)					Future prosp.	Overall assessment				Areas from gridded maps(km2)
		Area	% MS	Trend	Ref.	Agreed units Other units 50 - 200 indiv. 10 - 15 localities NA NA 225 - 268 grids10x10 5000 - 10000 indiv. NA NA 10000 - 50000 indiv. 80 - 120 grids10x10 Size&Unit	% MS	Trend	Ref.	Area	% MS	Qual.	Trend	Suitable		Curr. CS	Qualifier	Prev. CS	Nat. of ch.	Range	% MS	Distrib.	% MS
Open Original Report   CZ		2400	4	0	>2400	50 - 200 indiv.	0.3	-	>>50	420	3	m	-	N/A	N/A	U2	-	U2	a	2300	5.80	1100	2.90
Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Triturus dobrogicus" Information provided in the field 2.8.2: A dunai tarajosgőte esetében Magyarországon található a faj elterjedésének legnagyobb része. Az ország szinte minden síkvidéki vizes élőhelyén előfordul. A Nyugat-magyarországi-peremvidéken (Őrség, Kőszegi-és Soproni hegység) az alpesi tarajosgőte váltja fel, illetve északon, az Aggteleki-karszton a közönséges tarajosgőtével kevert állományai találhatóak. A dunai tarajosgőte elsősorban nyílt, fás borítástól mentessíkvidéki mocsarakban, folyók árterében fordul elő, de megtalálható mezőgazdasági területeken és lakott területeken is. Szaporodáshoz megfelelnek a kis kiterjedésű állóvizek, holtágak, csatornák és bányatavak. A faj az elterjedési területén belül nem tekinthető nagyon gyakori, közönséges fajnak. A populációk denzitása nagymértékbenfügg az élőhely állapotától. Open Original Report   HU		24545.50	40.9	0	>24545.50	N/A N/A	N/A	0	>	8000	57.3	m	0	9600	N/A	U1	=	U1-	b1	26000	65.20	21600	57.60
Open Original Report   RO		20000	33.3	x	≈20000	5000 - 10000 indiv.	19.9	x	≈5000	5000	35.8	m	x	5000	N/A	XX		N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Open Original Report   SK		13050.84	21.8	0	>13050.84	10000 - 50000 indiv.	79.7	0	>10000	548	3.9	m	-	589	N/A	U1	-	U1-		11600	29.10	14800	39.50
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
1		59996			59996	15050 - 60200 indiv. 1 N/A			15050 1 N/A											39900 1 N/A		37500 1 N/A
2XP			>19.9%FV >80%U1				>79.7%U1 >0.3%U2 >19.9%XX				>79.7%U1 >0.3%U2 >19.9%XX				>79.7%U1 >0.3%U2 >19.9%XX		>80%- >0%= >19.9%x		>99.6%?? >0%no >0.3%yes
3XP																>79.7%U1 >0.3%U2 >19.9%XX
2GD			??%FV 100%U1				>97.1%U1 >2.9%U2 ??%XX				>97.1%U1 >2.9%U2 ??%XX				>97.1%U1 >2.9%U2 ??%XX		>42.4%- >57.6%= ??%x		>39.5%?? >57.6%no >2.9%yes
3GD																>97.1%U1 >2.9%U2 ??%XX
2XR			>33.3%FV >66.7%U1				>62.7%U1 >4%U2 >33.3%XX				>62.7%U1 >4%U2 >33.3%XX				>62.7%U1 >4%U2 >33.3%XX		>25.8%- >40.9%= >33.3%x		>55.1%?? >40.9%no >4%yes
3XR																>62.7%U1 >4%U2 >33.3%XX
2GR			??%FV 100.1%U1				>94.3%U1 >5.8%U2 ??%XX				>94.3%U1 >5.8%U2 ??%XX				>94.3%U1 >5.8%U2 ??%XX		>34.9%- >65.2%= ??%x		>29.1%?? >65.2%no >5.8%yes
3GR																>94.3%U1 >5.8%U2 ??%XX
EU Biogeographical assessment and proposed corrections
MS/EU27		Area	Range Concl.	Trend	Ref.	Size&Unit	Pop. Concl.	Trend	Ref.	Area	Habitat Concl.		Trend	Suitable	Future prosp.	Curr. CS Concl.	Qualifier	Prev. CS Concl.	Nat. of ch.	Target 1
																				Contrib.	Type
EU27		59996	2XR		>59996		2XR			13968	2XR				2XR	MTX	=	U1	nc	D	=			0/0	05/14 EEA-ETC/BD Institution: Nature Conservation Agency CZ EEA-ETC/BD
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.