Article 17 web tool

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Habitat type new for the region ||
->Coverage: Habitat type new for the region ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: Habitat type new for the region ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: Le thurifère est une essence résistante et longévive, de fonctionnement bien différent des écosystèmes forestiers classiques. Nous connaissons encore mal les dynamiques fonctionnelles et structurelles internes des thurifèraies, mais des critères tels que la composition dendrologique à base de thurifère et des ligneux compagnons (quercus pubescens, prunus mahaleb, mais aussi les ligneux concurrents comme les pins), l'âge et la taille des thurifères (composition dendrométrique), ainsi que la régénération observée, facteur clé de la dynamique fonctionnelle des thurifèraies. La structure des peuplements est très variable (densité, âge des individus, ouverture des milieux) et difficilement utilisable en tant que telle. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The estimate of habitat area is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: Both cover and density of Juniperus trees are increasing as a consequence of the abandonment and reduction of grazing, with a tendency to a more homogeneous woodland and to a structure more prone to fires.
More atention should be paid in future to regeneration and fertility of populations, in order to detect changes in trends owed to climate change.

Open Original Report  

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range of the habitat type was calculated on the basis of its mapped distribution and a gap distance equal to 10 km. From the range, the grid cells connecting occurrences of the habitat type in which different species of Juniperus dominate were excluded. ||
->Coverage: The area covered by the habitat type is reported on the basis of the area of polygons including pure or mixed occurrences of the habitat type. For the polygons with mixed occurrence of the habitat type, the area of the other habitat types within the polygons has been excluded. ||
->HabCondition: The estimation of the habitat type’s area in good or not-good condition has been based on the results of sampling concerning the assessment of the conservation status of structure and functions per habitat type.
A small improvement in the overall trend of the conservation status of the habitat type is considered because of the measures taken during the project LIFE10 NAT/CY/000717 ||
->Future: Future prospects for the range and area were estimated by best expert
judgment, while for structure and function on the basis of the pressures and
threats recorded in a limited number of sampling plots (11) and the algorithm
cited in Tsiripidis et al. (2018). ||
->Conclusion: A small improvement in the overall trend of the conservation status of the habitat type is considered because of the measures taken during the project LIFE10 NAT/CY/000717 ||
->JustificationThreshold: Although the 12.5% of the habitat type was found no to be in good conservation status regarding its structure and functions and their prospects, the conservation status of these two parameters were set to favourable because the small sampling size used to acquire the above-mentioned results as well as on the basis of expert judgement. ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The surface area of the habitat (5.2) is equal to the area of the habitat within the Natura 2000 network (pSCIs, SCIs and SACs) (11.1), as reported for the previous reporting period (2007-2013). ||
->HabCondition: Assumption: 20% of habitat area is estimated to be in not-good condition. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report