Article 17 web tool

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range of the habitat type was calculated on the basis of its mapped distribution and a a gap distance equalt to 5 km. However, only the cells having suitable ecological conditions (i.e. crossed by rivers or being at a distance lower than 200 m from rivers) have been added in the range of the habitat type.
The Range map and the area of the Range are based on the available distribution data of the habitat type, including the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic Cyprus, the area not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus as well as the British Sovereign Base Areas. Distribution data from the area that is not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus, concerns mainly the occurrence of the habitat type in the grid cells and thus due to the low accuracy of distribution data, the gap distance was not applied for this area. ||
->Coverage: The area covered by the habitat type is reported on the basis of the area of polygons including pure or mixed occurrences of the habitat type. For the polygons with mixed occurrence of the habitat type, the area of the other habitat types within the polygons has been excluded.
The value of Surface Area, given in 5.2, concerns only the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus, but in the map of the Area also the grid cells where the habitat types is known to occur from the area not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus as well as the British Sovereign Base Areas, were added. ||
->HabCondition: The estimation of the habitat type’s area in good or not-good condition has been based on the results of sampling concerning the assessment of the conservation status of structure and functions per habitat type. ||
->Future: Future prospects for the range and area were estimated by best expert judgment, while for structure and function on the basis of the pressures and threats recorded in 56 sampling plots and the algorithm cited in Tsiripidis et al. (2018). ||
->Conclusion: The difference in the Conservation status of the habitat type from the previous reporting period is due to the fact that the structure and functions were revealed in bad conservation status and with bad prospects on the basis of the sampling conducted during the period 2013-2018 ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: Assumption: 90% of habitat area is estimated to be in good condition. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The estimate of habitat area is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabCondition: Nerium oleander,
Vitex agnus-castus,
Tamarix gallica,
Tamarix africana,
Tamarix arborea,
Tamarix canariensis ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: The Nerio-Tamaricetea community is very rare in the Maltese Islands and is mostly confined to inaccessible coastal areas and some valleys with an adequate water supply from springs or watercourses, particularly on the island of Gozo. It is much rarer in Malta and Comino, where the coastal woodlands have suffered from historical destruction in view of invasions, agriculture and construction. Indeed, Nerium oleander is believed to have become extinct from the Maltese Islands; the species is now naturalised in a few valleys in Malta and Gozo. The assessment is based on the type of community present and its extent, evident human impact, cover of alien species (including Aster squamatus, Conyza bonariensis, Acacia spp. and Ailanthus altissima) & reeds (especially Arundo donax and Phragmites australis), and future prospects. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: The data in this report has been mostly updated through habitat surveys carried out by the Environment and Resources Authority in 2017 and 2018. This exercise has enabled the assessment of the distribution and habitat condition with considerable accuracy. Field surveys were also complemented with desk studies, focussing on orthophoto analysis, and additional ground truthing, where possible. In this regard, the Authority has acquired drones with the aim to facilitate and assist future monitoring and surveying of all Annex I habitats.

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report