Article 17 web tool

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The estimate of habitat area is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Commentaire de 2012 : "Le seul jeu de données actuellement disponible est celui des FSD, qui recèlent des erreurs d'interprétation d'habitat, biaisant considérablement l'estimation de sa répartition dans le domaine considéré. La superficie proposée résulte de la somme des mailles de répartition de 10x10km dans le domaine continental, mais il s'agit d'une estimation grossière qui devra être affinée."
La modélisation de 2018 semble être plus ajustée, néanmoins des erreurs demeurent (dépt. Loire) qui doivent être rectifiées à la source (INPN, FSD).
||
->Coverage: Absence de données robustes sur la distribution et la surface de l'habitat dans le domaine continental, ne permettant pas d'estimer les tendances d'évolution à court et long termes, bien que celles-ci soient présumées défavorables. ||
->HabCondition: Eu égard les difficultés d'identification de l'habitat générique (notamment de distinction par rapport à d'autres forêts galeries riveraines), il n'est pas possible de préciser l'état de conservation des habitats élémentaires.
Bien qu'il s'agisse du plus important massif de forêt alluviale en superficie de l'ensemble de la moyenne vallée du Rhône, le site Natura 2000 de l'Ile de la Platière (dont l'état de conservation de l'habitat est considéré comme "Bon") ne peut pas être jugé représentatif de l'état général de l'habitat pour tout le domaine. Les autres sites Natura 2000 sont à cheval sur le domaine méditerranéen et le domaine continental, avec la majorité de leur extension dans le domaine méditerranéen. Il n'est pas pertinent d'extrapoler à partir de stations probablement mieux exprimées et plus étendues en dehors du domaine qui nous intéresse. ||
->Future: Perte de surface et dégradation de l'état de conservation de l'habitat ou de l'hydrosystème dans lequel il s'insère. ||
->Conclusion: QA feedback : Confirmation du résultat des Structures et fonction Inconnu (XX). Les synthèses de l'IGN ne mentionnent pas le 92A0 et ne permettent donc pas d'étayer l'analyse du paramètre structures et fonctions. Il n'est pas judicieux de baser l'évaluation sur la seule base du site Natura 2000 renseigné dans la synthèse des FSD, d'autant que nous ne disposons pas non plus des informations sur les méthodes d'évaluation de son état de conservation. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The estimate of habitat area is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Range has been calculated on the basis of 1X1 km grid cells and a gap distance equal to 2 km. However, only the cells having suitable ecological conditions (i.e. crossed by rivers or being at a distance lower than 200 m from rivers) have been added in the range of the habitat type. ||
->Coverage: The area covered by the habitat type is reported on the basis of the area of polygons including pure or mixed occurrences of the habitat type. For the polygons with mixed occurrence of the habitat type, the area of the other habitat types within the polygons has been excluded. ||
->HabCondition: The estimation of the habitat type’s area in good or not-good condition has been based on the results of sampling concerning the assessment of the conservation status of structure and functions per habitat type. ||
->Future: Future prospects for the range and area were estimated by best expert
judgment, while for structure and function on the basis of the pressures and
threats recorded in a limited number of sampling plots (10) and the algorithm
cited in Tsiripidis et al. (2018). ||
->Conclusion: The difference in the Conservation status of the habitat type from the previous reporting period is due to the fact that the structure and funcons as well as their prospects were revealed in bad conservation status on the basis of the sampling conducted during the period 2013-2018. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: Assumption: 90% of habitat area is estimated to be in good condition. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: The estimate of habitat area is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabCondition: Salix alba,
Populus alba,
Populus nigra,
Populus tremula,
Populus canescens ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: The native riparian forests are almost completely extinct from the Maltese Islands, and the existing range is only a fraction of the former range of this habitat type, as can be extrapolated from the literature records available since 1827. Only relicts survive in selected areas. This is mostly due to competition with agriculture and the need for water resources. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: The data in this report has been mostly updated through habitat surveys carried out by the Environment and Resources Authority in 2017 and 2018. This exercise has enabled the assessment of the distribution and habitat condition with considerable accuracy. Field surveys were also complemented with desk studies, focussing on orthophoto analysis, and additional ground truthing, where possible. In this regard, the Authority has acquired drones with the aim to facilitate and assist future monitoring and surveying of all Annex I habitats.

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Information provided in the field 2.7.5: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Coverage: N/A ||
->HabCondition: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report