Article 17 web tool

Log in

Habitat assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a habitat type belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that habitat type.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The ‘Data sheet info’ includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per habitat.

The ‘Audit trail’ includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad
Current selection: 2013-2018, Forests, 91H0 Pannonian woods with Quercus pubescens, All bioregions. Show all Forests
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Area (km2) Structure and functions (km2) Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution area(km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)
Trend FRR Min Max Best value Type est. Method Status
(% MS)
Trend FRA
Area in good condition (km2)
Good
(adjusted mean value)
Not good
(adjusted mean value)
Not Known
(adjusted mean value)
0.42 N/A N/A
24.11 N/A N/A
3.20 0.30 0.35
6.42 3.93 52.65
4.66 N/A N/A
0.64 0.01 N/A
379.15 0.68 N/A
6.26 0.38 0.88
16.99 N/A N/A
N/A N/A 3.75
0.52 0.46 0.01
195 72.50 42.50
2.85 2.74 15.41
Good
Not good Not known Status Trend Range
prosp.
Area
prosp.
S & f
prosp.
Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend
Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend
Status
Nat.
of ch.
CS trend
Nat. of ch.
Distrib. Method % MS
AT ALP 1900 4.67 = N/A N/A 0.42 estimate a 0.21 = > 0.42 - 0.42 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good poor good U1 U1 = U1 - noChange knowledge 1000 a 4.15
BG ALP 9700 23.83 = 9700 N/A N/A 24.11 estimate a 12.26 = 24.11 24.11 - 24.11 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = poor poor poor U1 U1 + U1 = noChange method 2400 a 9.96
IT ALP 19600 48.15 + > 68.77 149.60 N/A estimate b 55.50 - >> 3.20 - 3.20 0.30 - 0.30 0.35 - 0.35 U2 - poor bad bad U2 U2 - U2 - noChange noChange 11100 b 46.06
SK ALP 9505.19 23.35 = N/A N/A 63 estimate b 32.03 + 6.42 - 6.42 3.93 - 3.93 52.65 - 52.65 FV u good good good FV FV = U1 = knowledge N/A 9600 b 39.83
BG BLS 3800 100 = 3800 N/A N/A 4.66 estimate a 100 = 4.66 4.66 - 4.66 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = poor poor poor U1 U1 + U1 = noChange method 1300 a 100
AT CON 7300 9.63 = N/A N/A 0.65 estimate a 0.16 = > 0.64 - 0.64 0.01 - 0.01 N/A - N/A FV = good poor good U1 U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 2400 a 5.94
BG CON 53500 70.58 = 53500 N/A N/A 379.84 estimate a 92.08 = 379.84 379.15 - 379.15 0.68 - 0.68 N/A - N/A FV = poor poor poor U1 U1 + U1 = noChange method 30900 a 76.49
CZ CON 11200 14.78 = N/A N/A 7.52 estimate a 1.82 = 6.26 - 6.26 0.38 - 0.38 0.88 - 0.88 U1 - good poor poor U1 U2 - U2 - genuine genuine 5600 a 13.86
HR CON 2200 2.90 = N/A N/A 16.99 interval b 4.12 = 16.99 - 16.99 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV = N/A N/A noChange noChange N/A a 0
RO CON 1600 2.11 = N/A N/A 7.50 estimate a 1.82 = > N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - 7.50 XX x good good good FV U1 = U1 = N/A N/A 1500 a 3.71
CZ PAN 3200 12.71 = N/A N/A 0.99 estimate a 0.30 = 0.52 - 0.52 0.46 - 0.46 0.01 - 0.01 U2 - good poor poor U2 U2 - U2 - genuine genuine 700 a 3
HU PAN 18986 75.42 = 300 320 N/A estimate a 93.38 = 190 - 200 70 - 75 40 - 45 U1 u good good poor U1 U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 19500 b 83.69
SK PAN 2988.73 11.87 = N/A N/A 21 estimate b 6.33 + 2.85 - 2.85 2.74 - 2.74 15.41 - 15.41 U1 u good poor poor U1 U1 = FV N/A knowledge N/A 3100 b 13.30
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range
Trend FRR Min Max Best value Status
Area
Trend FRA Good Not good Not known Status Str.
& funct.
Trend Range
prosp.
Area
prosp.
S & f
prosp.
Status
Future
prosp.
Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend
2012 CS 2012 CS
trend
Status
Nat.
of ch.
CS trend
Nat. of ch.
2001-06 status
with
backcasting
Target 1
EU28 ALP 40705 1 + < 42665 156 237 197 1 - >> 197 34 | 34 | 34 4.23 | 4.23 | 4.23 159 | 159 | 159 1 x 2XA MTX - U2 - nc nc U2 C

01/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution:

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 BLS 3800 0MS = ≈ 3800 4.66 0MS = ≈ 4.66 4.66 | 4.66 | 4.66 - | - | - - | - | - 0MS = 0MS MTX = U1 = nc nc U1 D

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution:

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 75800 0EQ = ≈ 75800 413 413 413 1 = ≈ 413 403 | 403 | 403 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 0.88 | 8.38 | 4.63 2XA = 2XA MTX = U1 = nc nc U1 D

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution:

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 PAN 25175 0EQ = ≈ 25175 322 342 332 1 = ≈ 332 193 | 203 | 198 73 | 78 | 76 55 | 60 | 58 1 x 2XA MTX = U1 = nc nc U1 D

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution:

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
BG BLS - | - | - - | - | - - | - | - 2GD poor 2GD MTX N/A U1 N/A U1 0/2

03/20

WWF Bulgaria

Institution: WWF Bulgaria

Member State: BG

WWF Bulgaria
BG CON - | - | - - | - | - - | - | - 2GD poor 2GD MTX N/A U1 N/A U1 0/2

03/20

WWF Bulgaria

Institution: WWF Bulgaria

Member State: BG

WWF Bulgaria
BG ALP - | - | - - | - | - - | - | - 2GD poor 2GD MTX N/A U1 N/A U2 0/2

03/20

WWF Bulgaria

Institution: WWF Bulgaria

Member State: BG

WWF Bulgaria
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.