Article 17 web tool

Log in

Habitat assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a habitat type belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that habitat type.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The ‘Data sheet info’ includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per habitat.

The ‘Audit trail’ includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad
Current selection: 2013-2018, Heath & scrub, 4080 Sub-Arctic Salix spp. scrub, All bioregions. Show all Heath & scrub
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Area (km2) Structure and functions (km2) Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution area(km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)
Trend FRR Min Max Best value Type est. Method Status
(% MS)
Trend FRA
Area in good condition (km2)
Good
(adjusted mean value)
Not good
(adjusted mean value)
Not Known
(adjusted mean value)
11.14 1.17 N/A
N/A N/A 0.04
0.60 0.03 N/A
20 N/A N/A
N/A N/A 185
45.37 0.02 0.08
0.48 N/A N/A
0 N/A N/A
990 N/A 110
0.58 0.15 0.05
N/A 0.23 N/A
1 N/A N/A
13.50 N/A 1.50
N/A N/A 0.14
0.37 0 N/A
N/A N/A 1
0.05 0.08 N/A
Good
Not good Not known Status Trend Range
prosp.
Area
prosp.
S & f
prosp.
Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend
Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend
Status
Nat.
of ch.
CS trend
Nat. of ch.
Distrib. Method % MS
AT ALP 28800 15.82 x 3.78 20.84 N/A minimum b 0.90 x x 3.42 - 18.85 0.36 - 1.99 N/A - N/A FV x good good good FV FV x XX N/A knowledge noChange 10300 b 11.02
BG ALP 500 0.27 = 500 N/A N/A 0.04 minimum b 0 = 0.04 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.04 - 0.04 XX x poor poor poor U1 U1 = FV N/A method method 200 b 0.21
DE ALP 3450 1.90 = 3450 0.38 0.71 0.55 estimate b 0.04 = 0.50 - 0.70 0.01 - 0.04 N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 3400 a 3.64
FI ALP 16700 9.18 = N/A N/A 20 estimate a 1.46 = 20 - 20 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 8800 b 9.41
FR ALP 19000 10.44 = x 185 185 N/A minimum d 13.53 = x N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 185 - 185 FV = good good unk FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 14100 b 15.08
IT ALP 39300 21.59 = > 37.88 58.45 N/A estimate b 3.52 + 45.37 - 45.37 0.02 - 0.02 0.08 - 0.08 FV = good good good FV U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 22100 b 23.64
PL ALP 600 0.33 = N/A N/A 0.48 estimate b 0.04 + 0.48 - 0.48 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV + FV N/A noChange noChange 500 b 0.53
RO ALP 1100 0.60 = N/A N/A 0 minimum c 0 = > 0 - 0 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good unk good FV U1 = U1 = N/A N/A 900 a 0.96
SE ALP 71400 39.23 = 71400 N/A N/A 1100 estimate b 80.45 = 1100 990 - 990 N/A - N/A 110 - 110 FV = good good good FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 32000 b 34.22
SK ALP 1151.74 0.63 = N/A N/A 0.77 estimate b 0.06 = 0.58 - 0.58 0.15 - 0.15 0.05 - 0.05 FV u good good good FV FV = U1 = knowledge N/A 1200 b 1.28
UK ATL 11192.10 100 = x N/A N/A 0.23 estimate b 100 u x N/A - N/A 0.23 - 0.23 N/A - N/A U2 = unk unk bad U2 U2 = U2 - noChange genuine 3300 a 100
FI BOR 3800 24.52 = N/A N/A 1 estimate a 6.25 = 1 - 1 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 1000 b 40
SE BOR 11700 75.48 = 11700 N/A N/A 15 estimate b 93.75 = 15 13.50 - 13.50 N/A - N/A 1.50 - 1.50 FV = good good good FV FV = FV N/A noChange noChange 1500 b 60
BG CON 600 15 = 600 N/A N/A 0.14 minimum b 8.53 = 0.14 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.14 - 0.14 XX x poor poor poor U1 U1 x FV N/A method method 200 b 10.53
CZ CON 400 10 = N/A N/A 0.37 estimate a 22.64 + 0.37 - 0.37 0 - 0 N/A - N/A FV = good good good FV FV + FV N/A noChange noChange 400 a 21.05
FR CON 2900 72.50 = 1 1 N/A estimate b 60.91 = N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 1 - 1 XX = poor poor poor U1 U1 = U1 = method noChange 1300 b 68.42
PL CON 100 2.50 = N/A N/A 0.13 estimate b 7.92 + 0.04 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.09 N/A - N/A U2 - poor poor poor U1 U2 = FV N/A genuine noChange N/A b 0
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range
Trend FRR Min Max Best value Status
Area
Trend FRA Good Not good Not known Status Str.
& funct.
Trend Range
prosp.
Area
prosp.
S & f
prosp.
Status
Future
prosp.
Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend
2012 CS 2012 CS
trend
Status
Nat.
of ch.
CS trend
Nat. of ch.
2001-06 status
with
backcasting
Target 1
EU28 ALP 182001.74 2GD 2GD - | - | - - | - | - - | - | - 2GD 2GD MTX = U1 = nc nc U1 D

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 ATL 11192.10 0MS = x 0.23 0MS x x - | - | - 0.23 | 0.23 | - - | - | - 0MS = 0MS MTX = U2 - nc gen U2 D

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 BOR 15500 0EQ = 15500 16 0EQ = 16 14.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 0 | 0 | 0 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 0EQ = 2XA MTX = FV = nc nc FV A=

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 4000 1 = 4000 1.64 1.64 1.64 0EQ + 1.64 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.43 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.08 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.14 1 = 2XA MTX = U1 = nc nc U1 D

03/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.