Article 17 web tool

Log in
Article 17 > Habitat summary

Habitat assessments at EU biogeographical level

The Article 17 web tool provides an access to EU biogeographical and Member States’ assessments of conservation status of the habitat types and species of Community interest compiled as part of the Habitats Directive - Article 17 reporting process. These assessments have been carried out in EU25 for the period 2001-2006, in EU 27 for the period 2007-2012 and in EU28 for the period 2013-2018.

Choose a period, a group, then a habitat type belonging to that group.
Optionally, further refine your query by selecting one of the available biogeographical regions for that habitat type.
Once a selection has been made the conservation status can be visualised in a map view.

The ‘Data sheet info’ includes notes for each regional and overall assessment per habitat.

The ‘Audit trail’ includes the methods used for the EU biogeographical assessments and justifications for decisions made by the assessors.

Note: Rows in italic shows data not taken into account when performing the assessments (marginal presence, occasional, extinct prior HD, information, etc)

Legend
FV
Favourable
XX
Unknown
U1
Unfavourable-Inadequate
U2
Unfavourable-Bad
Current selection: 2013-2018, Coastal habitats, 1340 Inland salt meadows, All bioregions. Show all Coastal habitats
Member States reports
MS Region Range (km2) Area (km2) Structure and functions (km2) Future prospects Overall assessment Distribution area(km2)
Surface Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRR Min Max Best value Type est. Method Status
(% MS)		 Trend FRA
Area in good condition (km2)
Good
(adjusted mean value)		 Not good
(adjusted mean value)		 Not Known
(adjusted mean value)
N/A N/A N/A
0.01 0 0.05
0.13 0.02 N/A
N/A 0.01 N/A
N/A N/A 10.16
0.29 0.20 N/A
3.73 0.99 0.24
0.08 0.19 N/A
N/A N/A 7.70
N/A N/A 0.04
5.29 5.29 N/A
0.21 0.04 0.06
2.18 0.16 0.40
Good
Not good Not known Status Trend Range
prosp.		 Area
prosp.		 S & f
prosp.		 Status Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 Prev. CS Prev. CS
trend		 Status
Nat.
of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 Distrib. Method % MS
FR ALP 0.10 0.05 = ≈ N/A N/A 0 estimate d 0.49 = ≈ N/A - N/A N/A - N/A N/A - N/A U1 = good unk poor U1 U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 100 a 33.33
SK ALP 200 99.95 - ≈ N/A N/A 0.07 estimate b 99.51 - > 0.01 - 0.01 0 - 0 0.05 - 0.05 FV u poor poor poor U1 U2 - U2 = N/A N/A 200 b 66.67
DE ATL 2952 88.07 - >> 0.15 0.15 0.15 estimate b 96.81 - >> 0.13 - 0.13 0.02 - 0.02 N/A - N/A U1 = bad bad unk U2 U2 - U1 - genuine noChange 1700 b 89.47
UK ATL 400 11.93 = 400 N/A N/A 0.01 estimate a 3.19 = 0.01 N/A - N/A 0.01 - 0.01 N/A - N/A U2 = good good bad U2 U2 = U2 + noChange genuine 200 a 10.53
BG CON 3500 16.97 = 3500 N/A N/A 10.16 minimum b 29.67 = 10.16 N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 10.16 - 10.16 XX x poor poor poor U1 U1 x U1 = method method 1700 b 12.23
CZ CON 2600 12.60 = ≈ N/A N/A 0.49 estimate a 1.44 - >> 0.29 - 0.29 0.20 - 0.20 N/A - N/A U2 - poor poor bad U2 U2 - U2 - noChange noChange 1400 a 10.07
DE CON 10097 48.95 = > 4.34 5.17 4.97 estimate a 14.53 - > 3.36 - 4.10 0.70 - 1.29 0.17 - 0.32 U1 - poor poor poor U1 U1 - U1 = noChange method 7900 b 56.83
DK CON 530 2.57 = ≈ N/A N/A 0.27 estimate b 0.79 = ≈ 0.01 - 0.15 0.12 - 0.26 N/A - N/A U2 x good good bad U2 U2 x U1 = N/A N/A 300 b 2.16
FR CON 2300 11.15 = > N/A N/A 7.70 estimate c 22.50 = ≈ N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 7.70 - 7.70 U1 = good poor poor U1 U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 1300 a 9.35
IT CON 300 1.45 = ≈ 0.03 0.04 N/A estimate b 0.10 - > N/A - N/A N/A - N/A 0.03 - 0.04 XX - good poor poor U1 U1 = U1 = noChange noChange 300 b 2.16
PL CON 1300 6.30 = ≈ N/A N/A 10.60 estimate b 30.97 = ≈ 3.53 - 7.06 3.53 - 7.06 N/A - N/A U1 = good good poor U1 U1 = U2 = knowledge noChange 1000 b 7.19
CZ PAN 1500 54.94 = ≈ N/A N/A 0.30 estimate a 10.01 + >> 0.21 - 0.21 0.04 - 0.04 0.06 - 0.06 U2 - poor poor bad U2 U2 - U2 - noChange noChange 800 a 36.36
SK PAN 1230.14 45.06 = > N/A N/A 2.74 estimate b 89.99 = x 2.18 - 2.18 0.16 - 0.16 0.40 - 0.40 U1 u poor poor poor U1 U2 = U2 + N/A N/A 1400 b 63.64
Automatic Assessments Show,Hide
EU biogeographical assessments
MS/EU28 Region Surface Status
Range		 Trend FRR Min Max Best value Status
Area		 Trend FRA Good Not good Not known Status Str.
& funct.		 Trend Range
prosp.		 Area
prosp.		 S & f
prosp.		 Status
Future
prosp.		 Curr. CS Curr. CS
trend		 2012 CS 2012 CS
trend		 Status
Nat.
of ch.		 CS trend
Nat. of ch.		 2001-06 status
with
backcasting		 Target 1
EU28 ALP 200.10 1 - ≈ 200.10 0.07 0.07 0.07 1 - > 0.07 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.004 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.054 2XA x bad bad good 0EQ MTX - U2 = nc nong U2 C

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 ATL 3352 1 - >> 3352 0.16 0.16 0.16 1 - >> 0.16 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 0 | 0 | 0 2XA = bad bad poor 0EQ MTX - U1 - gen nc U1 C

12/19

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 CON 20627 1 = > 20627 33.59 34.43 34.23 1 = > 34.23 7.19 | 11.6 | 9.40 4.55 | 8.81 | 6.68 18.06 | 18.22 | 18.14 2XA - poor poor unk 2XA MTX - U2 = nong nong U2 C

04/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
EU28 PAN 2730.14 1 = > 2730.14 3.04 3.04 3.04 0EQ = >> 3.04 2.39 | 2.39 | 2.39 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 2XA x poor bad poor 2XA MTX = U2 + nc nong U2 D

02/20

EEA-ETC/BD

Institution: -

Member State:

EEA-ETC/BD
The current dataset is readonly, so you cannot add a conclusion.

Legal notice: A minimum amount of personal data (including cases of submitted comments during the public consultation) is stored in the web tool. These data are necessary for the functioning of the tool and are only accessible to tool administrators.

The distribution data for France (2013 – 2018 reporting) were corrected after the official submission of the Article 17 reports by France. The maps displayed via this web tool take into account these corrections, while the values under Distribution area (km2) used for the EU biogeographical assessment are based on the original Article 17 report submitted by France. More details are provided in the feedback part of the reporting envelope on CDR.